|
Emergency Preparedness FMJ Article
What Have You Done For Me Lately?
Two years after 9/11
Bill Conley
It has been two years after one of the most tragic events
to occur on American soil. On Sept. 11, 2001, the surreal
became the real. The shock and denial that we all felt as
wave after wave of reports washed over us and through us
still resonates in our culture and our lives.
The major impact though, the initial feelings of helplessness
and frustration, has waned over time. The fresh, raw grief
and outrage this atrocity fomented has turned instead to
the more passive feelings of sorrow and remembrances. This
is human nature. This is how we cope. Anything less than
an active approach, though, will allow history to repeat
itself.
As facility professionals, we are trained to handle crisis.
It is our role to provide for the safety, health and well-being
of the people and property in our charge. We are the first
line of defense against any disaster that may befall us.
This not only entails the physical security of our surroundings,
but also the emotional needs of our constituents and it
applies especially to the prospect of future threats.
Ground Zero
The immediate reaction to the events of 9/11 was the concept
of “more.” More security guards were hired,
more surveillance equipment was added, more locks and bars
were installed. The first inclination facilities managers
and corporations had was to create more impregnable buildings
and workplaces, to expend extra efforts into making our
sites unassailable.
According to an IFMA survey in February 2002, 90 percent
of the Facility Managers responding reassessed their security
systems after the attack on the World Trade Center. Correspondingly,
12 percent upgraded their video equipment and 23 percent
added additional private security officers. Interior and
exterior building patrols were increased. Armed guards were
hired. Nine percent of the respondents hired security consultants.
The trend to improve our safety through augmentation was
our first response.
As time went by, though, emotions gave way to pragmatism,
studies were developed on the causes and effects of terrorism,
and our approach to the problem shifted. Businesses have
moved their focus to emergency response and business continuity
efforts. This trend is evident from billion dollar companies
in the mid-west to multi-tenant buildings on the west coast.
Knowing the enemy
The real first step in anticipating a terrorist attack is
to try and understand the psychology behind these actions.
The question is not “will there be another attack?”,
but “when will there be another attack?” We
must recognize the eventuality of further incidents. We
have learned that these attacks can happen anywhere, at
any time. It doesn’t matter if all a company does
is manufacture dog scoop bags. Everyone is vulnerable.
Perpetrators of these acts do not believe in the sanctity
of life, either their own or others. It is almost impossible
to protect ourselves against a foe who is willing to end
their own life to cause us pain.
They do not look for a high-kill ratio. Thus, they use
conventional bombs rather than high-end explosives. Their
intent is more to disrupt our lives, our economy or our
business and weaken our morale more than to create a huge
body count. Although their level of planning may be complex,
for the most part the attacks are simplistic; ram &
destroy. This has been their modus operandi in nearly every
major terrorist attack over the past decade, from the USS
Cole, to the marine barracks in Lebanon, to the two attacks
on the World Trade Center.
Our job, assuming damage is done, is to minimize the destruction
and get back to business as quickly and as seamlessly as
possible.
First steps
In order for facility management to rise up to this challenge
that in actuality faces us every day, there are things that
we can do, that we must do. It involves creating and subscribing
to a pact, whether it be tacit or expressed, between ourselves
and those who rely on us. This pact revolves around four
major activities: preparation, awareness, communication
and training. Its strength lies in continuity and adherence.
The road to ruin is paved with good intentions; the path
to success relies on perseverance.
In the last two years, FMs worldwide have come to understand
this better. It has become crystal clear that great plans
can’t be created and then left on the shelf. Practice,
repetition and visibility of the plan must become an integral
part of life in the workplace.
As a case in point, in 1993, a bomb went off in the underground
parking lot of the World Trade Center. Six people were killed.
Based on that attack, all companies in the complex embarked
on the development and implementation of evacuation procedures.
Training of responsible personnel was ongoing and periodic
drills were conducted regularly. When the planes struck
the towers on Sept. 11, approximately 2,800 people died.
Yet more than 25,000 people were evacuated safely. The saving
of so many lives was due only to the fact that evacuation
training was conducted, upgraded and practiced in a dedicated
effort for the intervening eight years.
There is empowerment through preparedness. A tangible
sense of confidence and strength is evident when people
feel that they are ready for anything. A facility manager
in Kansas City expanded her security procedures to cover
the possibility of an attack. Two years later, she says;
“How do we feel now? Strong, alert and vigilant.”
Preparation
A plan has two major phases. First, it needs to be developed.
One major company in Orange County, Calif. not only revisited
its security plans, but it almost completely revamped it.
The event convinced upper management to focus more on preparedness
and continuity planning. It caused the creation of a team
to develop a formal business continuity guidance manual.
This manual was used as a guideline that all offices and
business units could use as a tool that along with site
audits would help develop individual plans endemic to their
sites.
However, a plan is only as good as the last time it was
tested. It must be rewritten and updated as time goes by.
It must be utilized regularly so that everyone is familiar
with it. It should be treated as a living document subject
and subjected to change. It has to be maintained. The maintenance
of any program is where most of the pitfalls appear. It’s
very easy to have ideas, but to work them through the years
means overcoming boredom, stagnancy and lack of interest.
There is a direct correlation between the rise of apathy
and the fading of memories. As has been said many times
before, a plan must be “worked” in order for
it to be a viable, successful option.
Awareness
Awareness is key, but it must be cultivated and kept alive.
To many, this may sound like Observation 101. But in many
cases, the most simple applications of common sense are
the ones we take for granted. People sometimes forget to
do the obvious thing when hustling from point A to point
B, or when engrossed in their activities. If we harken back
to our childhood when crossing the street, we may still
hear our parents’ admonishments to “Stop, look
and listen.” That precept still works today.
Everyone in the facility must learn to be continually
observant during the course of the day. This applies to
safety hazards as well as intrusive presences, but in the
case of terrorism, the need to be aware of surroundings
has been heightened.
Employees must know what to look for: strangers in or
around the site, unfamiliar cars in the parking areas (especially
for extended periods of time), anything out of the ordinary.
Sometimes these just register subconsciously. There is a
feeling that something is wrong, but people don’t
pay attention to it. They must learn to take the time to
make note of these anomalies.
Facility managers are usually the most attuned to these
types of feelings. There is a certain resonance evident
when all is going well––a constant hum of sorts.
The noise, when something is not quite right, that points
to something being a kilter can be quite strident, an inner
voice that cautions us to “check this out.”
We need to pay attention to these early warnings.
Employees need to know where and to whom their observations
should be reported. Again, this is part of working the plan.
If we don’t have a control point, all the efforts
and awareness in the world will prove worthless.
Finally, we need the means to investigate and mitigate
any such occurrences in the workplace. Whether we have someone
on site that is qualified and trained to handle these types
of situations, or we have a good rapport with local law
enforcement agencies, knowing about a situation and being
able to handle it are as different as night and day. As
much as we feel that we are the ones responsible for the
safety and well-being of our site, it may not always be
the smartest thing in the world for an FM to try and be
the saviour.
Communication
Having a plan is great. Working the plan is great. However,
it is probably fairly important that you communicate the
plan. Keeping employees apprised of policy and procedures
and updates will go a long way in ensuring success.
Department heads and senior management must be a part
of this process. Not only do we need their buy-in and support,
but we must always alert them to changes that will affect
them or their employees.
Some FMs have a Web site or a place on the company’s
intranet where information is accessible. Reminder emails
are sent out on a periodic basis as well as notifications
of any changes. Other departments may have manuals or even
a basic outline posted on bulletin boards. Site maps and
evacuation routes should also be posted in well-traveled
areas for visitors and guests in the facility. The more
information that can be disseminated and ingested, the better
off everyone will be.
Communication external to the facility is important also.
We must create and utilize a large sphere of influence and
feedback. Letting our neighbors know our plans and coordinating
with them will facilitate evacuations and/or damage control
when necessary. It also helps to have an established communications
network within the local business community. In the cities
of Los Angeles, Calif. and Phoenix, Ariz., for instance,
there are regularly held meetings amongst businesses, law
enforcement agencies, fire and emergency services to conduct
planning and drills for the general area. Contacts within
each business have also been created to report untoward
activities or suspicious circumstances. They have created
a macro-sized “neighborhood crime watch” system.
The whole community has mobilized to increase awareness
and create an early warning system.
As an offshoot of this, maintaining a strong and open
relationship with local civil authorities is crucial to
safety and security. Having someone to turn to for assistance
and guidance, as well as enforcement and containment can
be very beneficial in every aspect of running a facility.
The more they know about us and our business, the easier
it can be for them to respond to our needs. In some towns
and cities, a local fire station crew will come out and
evaluate evacuation efforts for us, actually taking part
in the drills.
Training
If execution is 90 percent of planning, then training is
90 percent of execution. Drills and responsibilities must
be performed and repeated again and again.
Some of the procedures that facilities employ entail evacuation
drills on a regular basis. Floor wardens have been chosen.
Volunteers are best, as they will be more committed to consistency
than employees who are designated. These wardens are responsible
for geographic areas in the facility, whether it be floors
of a high-rise or areas of large, single-story facilities.
They are to control the flow of traffic out of the building,
ensure that everyone in their tactical area of responsibility
is accounted for, and maintain education and communication
throughout the year for their charges.
Some companies have even gone so far as to implement a
“buddy” system. Many departments have employees
who work together constantly. With a “buddy”
system, we can track all personnel, knowing if someone is
out sick, on vacation, at an off-site meeting or just away
from their work area when an evacuation is necessitated.
Another action that 9/11 prompted companies to take was
to establish a medical response team. Members of this team
have the responsibility to handle medical emergencies in
the workplace. The availability and use of automatic external
defibrillators (AEDs) has also become more prevalent in
some workplaces. The American Red Cross can help with training
on these machines.
This task force of managers, wardens, security and medical
responders must be continually challenged to adhere to their
duties. Periodic drills and exercises must be performed
optimally on a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Emergency
communications devices, alarm systems, paging and public
address systems must be tested. Assembly areas must be chosen
for accessibility and safety. These areas must be checked
regularly to see if they are still usable.
Experience has taught us that dust can’t collect
on our tools, whether they be emergency plans or electronic
devices, and neither can rust collect on our consciousness.
We must stay active to be effective, and it is hoped that
the events of 9/11 have shown everyone that drills and training
classes might disrupt productivity a bit, but they are better
than the alternative.
Aftermath
There’s a certain feeling of self-satisfaction that
facility managers get with the realization that we’ve
done a good job. Usually, FMs don’t get the kudos
that we think (we know) that we deserve, so sometimes our
only solace is the fact that everything that can be done
has been done. In fact, most of the activities handled in
facility management are performed so that adverse occurrences
do not happen. It is a rare melding of reactive and proactive
stances, using history to project the future. Thus we implement
preventive maintenance, analyze cycles and formulate plans––strategic,
tactical and operational––to prepare for any
eventuality.
As leaders in the workplace, it’s up to us to look
beyond the day to day activities of bringing in revenue
and ensure that others understand that without these efforts,
without constancy of purpose and dedication to security
issues more is at stake than mere dollars.
One CFM put it this way, “The success of any program
put in place is driven by the passion and desire of the
facility manager to maintain a safe and secure work environment.”
It may be needed to add that we must infect others with
that attitude.
FMJ
About the author: Bill Conley, CFM, CFMJ,
is one of the principals of CFM2, a facility management
consulting practice in Aliso Viejo, Calif., along with his
wife, Anita Ciminesi. He is also a frequent contributer
to Facility Management Journal.
Acknowledgements: The author would like
to thank the following IFMA members for their input and
advice on this article: Don Burrus, CFM; Anita Ciminesi;
Cheryl Johnson, CFM; Donna Koontz; Phyllis Meng, CFM, IFMA
Fellow; Mark Sekula, CFM; Jim Sharer, CFM; and John Sorich,
CFM.
|